Paper detail

Investigation of positive streamers by double pulse experiments, effects of repetition rate and gas

Streamer discharges are often operated in a repetitively pulsed mode and are therefore influenced by species left over from the previous discharge, especially free electrons and ions. We have investigated these effects by applying two consecutive positive high voltage pulses of 200-700 ns duration to a point plane gap in artificial air, pure nitrogen, other nitrogen-oxygen mixtures and pure argon at pressures between 67 and 533 mbar. The pulses had pulse-to-pulse intervals (Δt) between 200 ns and 40 ms. We imaged both discharges with two ICCD cameras and combined this to a compound image. We observe for values of Δt below 0.5-15 μs (at 133 mbar, depending on gas mixture) that during the second pulse the streamers continue the paths of the first-pulse streamers. We call the maximal time for which this continuation still occurs the continuation time. For N$_{2}$ - O$_{2}$ mixtures, this time has a maximum at an oxygen concentration of about 0.2%. According to our plasma chemical modelling this maximum is determined by the electron loss rate which has a minimum around this oxygen concentration. Depending on oxygen concentration the dominant recombining positive ion is N$_{4}^{+}$, O$_2^+$ or O$_{4}^{+}$ where O$_{2}^{+}$ dominates around 0.2% O$_{2}$ and recombines slowest. For increasing values of Δt we observe that after the continuation phase first no new streamers occur at all, then new streamers show up that avoid the entire pre-ionized region. Next we see new thin streamers that follow the edges of the old channels. For larger Δt (10-200 μs) the new streamers start to increase in size and move to the centre of the old channel. Finally, around millisecond timescales the new channels are completely independent of the old channels.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.