Paper detail

Investigation of homogeneity and matter distribution on large scales using large quasar groups

We use 12 large quasar group (LQG) samples to investigate the homogeneity of $0.5\lesssim z \lesssim 2$ Universe ($z$ denotes the redshift). We calculate the bias factor $b$ and the two-point correlation function $ξ_{\rm LQG}$ for such groups for three different density profiles of the LQG dark matter halos, i.e. the isothermal profile, the Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) profile, and the (gravitational) lensing profile. We consider the $Λ$CDM concordance model of our Universe with $Ω_m=0.28$, $Ω_Λ=0.72$, the Hubble constant $H_0=100h~$km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ with $h=0.72$ in our calculations. Dividing the samples into three redshift bins, we find that the LQGs with higher redshift are more biased and correlated than those with lower redshift. The redshift-increasing LQG correlation amplitudes we find is incompatible with that predicted by the standard theory of structure growth. The homogeneity scale $R_H$ of the LQG distribution is also deduced. It is defined as the comoving radius of the sphere inside which the number of LQGs $N(<r)$ is proportional to $r^3$ within $1\%$, or equivalently above which the correlation dimension of the sample $D_2$ is within $1\%$ of $D_2=3$. For the NFW dark matter halo profile, the homogeneity scales of the LQG distribution are $R_H\simeq 224$ $h^{-1}$Mpc for $0.5< z\leq 1$, $R_H\simeq 316$ $h^{-1}$Mpc for $1< z\leq 1.5$, and $R_H\simeq 390$ $h^{-1}$Mpc for $1.5< z\lesssim 2$. These values are above the characteristic sizes of the LQG samples in each bin, implying the validity of the cosmological principle on the LQG scale, i.e. a length range of $200\sim 400~h^{-1}$Mpc and a mass scale of $\sim 10^{14}$M$_\odot$. ...

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.