Investigation of homogeneity and matter distribution on large scales using large quasar groups

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Abstract

We use 12 large quasar group (LQG) samples to investigate the homogeneity of 0.5≲z≲20.5\lesssim z \lesssim 2 Universe (zz denotes the redshift). We calculate the bias factor bb and the two-point correlation function ξLQGξ_{\rm LQG} for such groups for three different density profiles of the LQG dark matter halos, i.e. the isothermal profile, the Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) profile, and the (gravitational) lensing profile. We consider the ΛΛCDM concordance model of our Universe with Ωm=0.28Ω_m=0.28, ΩΛ=0.72Ω_Λ=0.72, the Hubble constant H0=100h H_0=100h~km s−1^{-1} Mpc−1^{-1} with h=0.72h=0.72 in our calculations. Dividing the samples into three redshift bins, we find that the LQGs with higher redshift are more biased and correlated than those with lower redshift. The redshift-increasing LQG correlation amplitudes we find is incompatible with that predicted by the standard theory of structure growth. The homogeneity scale RHR_H of the LQG distribution is also deduced. It is defined as the comoving radius of the sphere inside which the number of LQGs N(<r)N(<r) is proportional to r3r^3 within 1%1\%, or equivalently above which the correlation dimension of the sample D2D_2 is within 1%1\% of D2=3D_2=3. For the NFW dark matter halo profile, the homogeneity scales of the LQG distribution are RH≃224R_H\simeq 224 h−1h^{-1}Mpc for 0.5<z≤10.5< z\leq 1, RH≃316R_H\simeq 316 h−1h^{-1}Mpc for 1<z≤1.51< z\leq 1.5, and RH≃390R_H\simeq 390 h−1h^{-1}Mpc for 1.5<z≲21.5< z\lesssim 2. These values are above the characteristic sizes of the LQG samples in each bin, implying the validity of the cosmological principle on the LQG scale, i.e. a length range of 200∼400 h−1200\sim 400~h^{-1}Mpc and a mass scale of ∼1014\sim 10^{14}M⊙_\odot. ...

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.