Paper detail

Investigation of dust properties of the proto-planetary nebula IRAS 18276-1431

We investigate the circumstellar dust properties of the oxygen-rich bipolar proto-planetary nebula IRAS 18276-1431 by means of two-dimensional radiative transfer simulations of the circumstellar dust shell. The model geometry is assumed to have a torus and an envelope. The parameters of the dust and the dust shell are constrained by comparing the SED and NIR intensity and polarisation data with the models. The polarisation in the envelope reaches 50 -- 60 % and is nearly constant in the H and K_S bands in the observations. This weak wavelength dependence of the polarisation can be reproduced with a grain size distribution function for the torus: 0.05 micron <= a with n(a)=a^{-(p=5.5)}exp(-a/{a_c=0.3 micron}). The power index p is significantly steeper than that for interstellar dust. Similar results have also been found in some other PPNs and suggest that mechanisms that grind down large particles may also have acted when the dust particles formed. The spectral opacity index beta is found to be 0.6+/-0.5 from the millimeter fluxes. This low value indicates the presence of large dust grains in the torus. We discuss two possible dust models for the torus. One has a size distribution function of 1.0 micron <= a <= a_max=5,000.0 micron with n(a)=a^{-(p=2.5)} and the other is 1.0 micron <= a <= a_max=10,000.0 micron with n(a)=a^{-(p=3.5)}. The former has beta of 0.633, but we are not able to find reasonable geometry parameters to fit the SED in the infrared. The latter has beta of 1.12, but reproduces the SED better over a wide wavelength range. With this dust model, the geometric parameters are estimated as follows: the inner and outer radii are 30 AU and 1000 AU and the torus mass is 3.0 M_sun. Assuming an expansion velocity of 15 kms^{-1}, the torus formation time and mass-loss rate are found to be \sim300 yrs and \sim10^{-2}M_sun yr^{-1} respectively.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.