Paper detail

Investigating the Late Stages of Stellar Evolution with Long Period Variables from MACHO and 2MASS

We are re-analyzing the MACHO variable star database to explore the relationships between pulsation, evolution, and mass loss in evolved stars. We will analyze the multi-periodic properties of long period variable (LPV) stars, 50% of which could not be assigned any period in the original analysis. Recent results show that the missing stars may be an important element in understanding the origin of the period-luminosity sequences observed in the LMC. Our goal is to characterize the morphology and periodic properties of these stars, and then use the stars' 2MASS colors along with theoretical isochrones to understand their mass loss and evolution. We will develop a luminosity-independent criteria to classify the LMC LPVs, which can then be applied to Galactic LPVs. This will enable a synthesis of knowledge between LPVs in the LMC and the well-studied Galactic examples.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.