Paper detail

Investigating Randomly Generated Adjacency Matrices For Their Use In Modeling Wireless Topologies

Generation of realistic topologies plays an important role in determining the accuracy and validity of simulation studies. This study presents a discussion to justify why, and how often randomly generated adjacency matrices may not not conform to wireless topologies in the physical world. Specifically, it shows through analysis and random trials that, more than 90% of times, a randomly generated adjacency matrix will not conform to a valid wireless topology, when it has more than 3 nodes. By showing that node triplets in the adjacency graph need to adhere to rules of a geometric vector space, the study shows that the number of randomly chosen node triplets failing consistency checks grow at the order of O(base^3), where base is the granularity of the distance metric. Further, the study models and presents a probability estimate with which any randomly generated adjacency matrix would fail realization. This information could be used to design simpler algorithms for generating k-connected wireless topologies.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.