Paper detail

Investigating Galactic binary cluster candidates with Gaia EDR3

A number of stellar open cluster (OC) pairs in the Milky Way occupy similar positions in the phase space (coordinates, parallax and proper motions) and therefore may constitute physically interacting systems. The characterization of such objects based on observational data is a fundamental step towards a proper understanding of their physical status and to investigate cluster pair formation in the Galaxy. In this work, we employed Gaia EDR3 data to investigate a set of 16 OCs distributed as seven stellar aggregates. We determined structural parameters and applied a decontamination technique that allowed to obtain unambiguous lists of member stars. The studied OCs span Galactocentric distances and ages in the ranges ~7 < $R_G$ (kpc) < ~11 and 7.3 <= log t <= 9.2. Eight OCs were found to constitute 4 gravitationally bound pairs (NGC5617-Trumpler22, Collinder394-NGC6716, Ruprecht100-Ruprecht101, NGC659-NGC663, the latter being a dynamically unevolved binary) and other 4 clusters constitute 2 interacting, but gravitationally unbound, pairs (King16-Berkeley4, NGC2383-NGC2384, the latter being a dissolving OC). Other 4 OCs (Dias1, Pismis19, Czernik20, NGC1857) seem not associated to any stellar aggregates. Apparently, clusters within bound and dynamically evolved pairs tend to present ratios of half-light to tidal radius larger than single clusters located at similar $R_G$, suggesting that mutual tidal interactions may possibly affect their structural parameters. Unbound or dynamically unevolved systems seems to present less noticeable signature of tidal forces on their structure. Moreover, the core radius seems more importantly correlated with the clusters&#39; internal dynamical relaxation process.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.