Paper detail

Investigating CO$_{2}$ streamer inception in repetitive pulsed discharges

In this study, we investigate the responsible species and processes involved in repetitive pulsed streamer inception in CO$_{2}$. We applied a 10 kV high-voltage pulse with a repetition frequency of 10 Hz and pulse width of 1 ms to a pin electrode which is placed 160 mm apart from the grounded plane electrode. We measured the inception times (delay between the rising edge of the high-voltage pulse) by a photo-multiplier tube for 600 high voltage cycles. We observed one peak in the histogram of inception times with a median of 1.2$μ$s. To identify the source of this peak, we applied a negative or positive LV pulse before the main HV pulse to manipulate the leftover space charges. Three different phenomena are observed: 1) drift, 2) neutralization, and 3) ionization in the LV pulse. At low LV amplitude and pulse width, the peak starts to drift toward the faster and slower inception times under a positive and negative LV pulse, respectively. However, under the same LV pulse configuration for positive and negative LV pulse, the observed shift in inception times is not the same. We present a hypothesis to explain this asymmetry based on the difference of the detachment processes between air and CO$_{2}$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.