Paper detail

Inverting the cut-tree transform

We consider fragmentations of an R-tree $T$ driven by cuts arriving according to a Poisson process on $T \times [0, \infty)$, where the first co-ordinate specifies the location of the cut and the second the time at which it occurs. The genealogy of such a fragmentation is encoded by the so-called cut-tree, which was introduced by Bertoin and Miermont for a fragmentation of the Brownian continuum random tree. The cut-tree was generalised by Dieuleveut to a fragmentation of the $α$-stable trees, $α\in (1, 2)$, and by Broutin and Wang to the inhomogeneous continuum random trees of Aldous and Pitman. Remarkably, in all of these cases, the law of the cut-tree is the same as that of the original R-tree. In this paper, we develop a clean general framework for the study of cut-trees of R-trees. We then focus particularly on the problem of reconstruction: how to recover the original R-tree from its cut-tree. This has been studied in the setting of the Brownian CRT by Broutin and Wang, where they prove that it is possible to reconstruct the original tree in distribution. We describe an enrichment of the cut-tree transformation, which endows the cut tree with information we call a consistent collection of routings. We show this procedure is well-defined under minimal conditions on the R-trees. We then show that, for the case of the Brownian CRT and the $α$-stable trees with $α\in (1, 2)$, the original tree and the Poisson process of cuts thereon can both be almost surely reconstructed from the enriched cut-trees. For the latter results, our methods make essential use of the self-similarity and re-rooting invariance of these trees.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.