Paper detail

Invertibility via distance for non-centered random matrices with continuous distributions

Let $A$ be an $n\times n$ random matrix with independent rows $R_1(A),\dots,R_n(A)$, and assume that for any $i\leq n$ and any three-dimensional linear subspace $F\subset {\mathbb R}^n$ the orthogonal projection of $R_i(A)$ onto $F$ has distribution density $ρ(x):F\to{\mathbb R}_+$ satisfying $ρ(x)\leq C_1/\max(1,\|x\|_2^{2000})$ ($x\in F$) for some constant $C_1>0$. We show that for any fixed $n\times n$ real matrix $M$ we have $${\mathbb P}\{s_{\min}(A+M)\leq t n^{-1/2}\}\leq C'\, t,\quad\quad t>0,$$ where $C'>0$ is a universal constant. In particular, the above result holds if the rows of $A$ are independent centered log-concave random vectors with identity covariance matrices. Our method is free from any use of covering arguments, and is principally different from a standard approach involving a decomposition of the unit sphere and coverings, as well as an approach of Sankar-Spielman-Teng for non-centered Gaussian matrices.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.