Paper detail

Inversions in split trees and conditional Galton--Watson trees

We study $I(T)$, the number of inversions in a tree $T$ with its vertices labeled uniformly at random, which is a generalization of inversions in permutations. We first show that the cumulants of $I(T)$ have explicit formulas involving the $k$-total common ancestors of $T$ (an extension of the total path length). Then we consider $X_n$, the normalized version of $I(T_n)$, for a sequence of trees $T_n$. For fixed $T_{n}$'s, we prove a sufficient condition for $X_n$ to converge in distribution. As an application, we identify the limit of $X_n$ for complete $b$-ary trees. For $T_n$ being split trees, we show that $X_n$ converges to the unique solution of a distributional equation. Finally, when $T_n$'s are conditional Galton--Watson trees, we show that $X_n$ converges to a random variable defined in terms of Brownian excursions. By exploiting the connection between inversions and the total path length, we are able to give results that are stronger and much broader compared to previous work by Panholzer and Seitz.

preprint2018arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.