Paper detail

Inversion in a four-terminal superconducting device on the quartet line: I. Two-dimensional metal and the quartet beam splitter

In connection with the recent Harvard group experiment on graphene-based four-terminal Josephson junctions containing a grounded loop, we consider biasing at opposite voltages on the quartet line and establish lowest-order perturbation theory in the tunnel amplitudes between a two-dimensional (2D) metal and four superconducting leads in the dirty limit. We present in addition general nonperturbative and nonadiabatic results. The critical current on the quartet line $I_c(Φ/Φ_0)$ depends on the reduced flux $Φ/Φ_0$ via interference between the three-terminal quartets (3TQ) and the nonstandard four-terminal split quartets (4TSQ). The 4TSQ result from synchronizing two Josephson junctions by exchange of two quasiparticles "surfing" on the 2D quantum wake, and this mechanism is already operational at equilibrium. Perturbation theory in the tunnel amplitudes shows that the 3TQ are $π$-shifted but the 4TSQ are $0$-shifted if the contacts have linear dimension which is large compared to the elastic mean free path. We establish the gate voltage dependence of the quartet critical current oscillations $I_c(Φ/Φ_0)$. It is argued that "Observation of $I_c(0)\ne I_c(1/2)$" implies "Evidence for the four-terminal 4TSQ" for finite bias voltage on the quartet line and arbitrary interface transparencies. This statement relies on physically-motivated approximations leading to the Ambegaokar-Baratoff-type formula for the quartet critical current-flux relation. It is concluded that the recent experiment mentioned above finds evidence for the four-terminal 4TSQ.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.