Paper detail

Inversion formula for determining parameters of an astrometric binary

It is believed that some numerical technique must be employed for the determination of the system parameters of a visual binary or a star with a planet because the relevant equations are not only highly nonlinear but also transcendental owing to the Kepler's equation. Such a common sense, however, is not true; we discover an analytic inversion formula, in which the original orbital parameters are expressed as elementary functions of the observable quantities such as the location of four observed points and the time interval between these points. The key thing is that we use the time interval but not the time of each observation in order to avoid treating the Kepler's equation. The present formula can be applied even in cases where the observations cover a short arc of the orbit during less than one period. Thus the formula will be useful in the future astrometric missions such as SIM, GAIA and JASMINE.

preprint2004arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.