Paper detail

Inverse problems for symmetric doubly stochastic matrices whose Suleĭmanova spectra are bounded below by 1/2

A new sufficient condition for a list of real numbers to be the spectrum of a symmetric doubly stochastic matrix is presented; this is a contribution to the classical spectral inverse problem for symmetric doubly stochastic matrices that is still open in its full generality. It is proved that whenever $λ_2, \ldots, λ_n$ are non-positive real numbers with $1 + λ_2 + \ldots + λ_n \geqslant 1/2$, then there exists a symmetric, doubly stochastic matrix whose spectrum is precisely $(1, λ_2, \ldots, λ_n)$. We point out that this criterion is incomparable to the classical sufficient conditions due to Perfect-Mirsky, Soules, and their modern refinements due to Nader et al. We also provide some examples and applications of our results.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.