Paper detail

Inverse Cosmography: testing the effectiveness of cosmographic polynomials using machine learning

Cosmography has been referred to as a solution to the inverse scattering problem, which is reasonable since it allows us to calculate cosmological bounds from data samplers by performing an expansion of the cosmological observables around present time. Nevertheless, this approach is not properly an inverse scattering solution since the method only circumvents the problem to fit the equation of state (EoS) parameters (model-dependent) by replacing it with their fit of its cosmographic parameters (with a polynomial series-dependence). Therefore, can we construct a new cosmography approach where the cosmodynamical parameters can be fitted and then employ them to analyse the kinematics via its generic cosmographic parameters? By all means, without experimenting the problem of truncation of the series that all cosmography proposals in the literature argue. In this work we present a generic EoS depending solely on the form of $f_i(z)$ and its derivative is found, where this function can be any polynomial (mimicking a dark energy-like term) that allow the dynamics of a specific cosmological density. We test our generic EoS with standard cosmological models and with polynomials proposals as Padé and Chebyshev approximants. Interesting enough, a Padé (2,2) approximant has been considered inside a $f(z)$CDM-like model showing a transition in $z=1$. Also, we found that this is not assured since models with these characteristics have degeneracy and truncation problems that experiment a divergence at this redshift limit. To explore our results, also we present a new supernovae sample trained via a deep learning tool called Recurrent-Bayesian (RNN+BNN) network that can solve problems as overfitting at lower redshifts and increase the density of data points in this region, which can help to discern between cosmographies at 2-$σ$ of precision.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.