Paper detail

Invasion rate versus diversity in population dynamics with catastrophes

A key question in the current diversity crisis is how diversity has been maintained throughout evolution and how to preserve it. Modern coexistence theories suggest that a high invasion rate of rare new types is directly related to diversity. We show that adding almost any mechanism of catastrophes to a stochastic birth, death, and mutation process with limited carrying capacity induces a novel phase transition characterized by a positive invasion rate but a low diversity. In this phase, new types emerge and grow rapidly, but the resulting growth of very large types decreases diversity. This model also resolves two major drawbacks of neutral evolution models: their failure to explain balancing selection without resorting to fitness differences and the unrealistic time required for the creation of the observed large types. We test this model on a classical case of genetic polymorphism: the HLA locus.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.