Paper detail

Invariant characterization of the growing and decaying density modes in LTB dust models

We obtain covariant expressions that generalize the growing and decaying density modes of linear perturbation theory of dust sources by means of the exact density perturbation from the formalism of quasi--local scalars associated to weighed proper volume averages in LTB dust models. The relation between these density modes and theoretical properties of generic LTB models is thoroughly studied by looking at the evolution of the models through a dynamical system whose phase space is parametrized by variables directly related to the modes themselves. The conditions for absence of shell crossings, as well as sign conditions on the modes, become interrelated fluid flow preserved constraints that define phase space invariant subspaces. In the general case (both density modes being nonzero) the evolution of phase space trajectories exhibits the expected dominance of the decaying/growing in the early/late evolution times defined by past/future attractors characterized by asymptotic density inhomogeneity. In particular, the growing mode is also dominant for collapsing layers that terminate in a future attractor associated with a "Big Crunch" singularity, which is qualitatively different from the past attractor marking the "Big Bang". Suppression of the decaying mode modifies the early time evolution, with phase space trajectories emerging from an Einstein--de Sitter past attractor associated with homogeneous conditions. Suppression of the growing mode modifies the late time evolution as phase space trajectories terminate in future attractors associated with homogeneous states. General results are obtained relating the signs of the density modes and the type of asymptotic density profile (clump or void). A critical review is given of previous attempts in the literature to define these density modes for LTB models.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.