Paper detail

Intuitionistic logic with two Galois connections combined with Fischer Servi axioms

Earlier, the authors introduced the logic IntGC, which is an extension of intuitionistic propositional logic by two rules of inference mimicking the performance of Galois connections (Logic J. of the IGPL, 18:837-858, 2010). In this paper, the extensions Int2GC and Int2GC+FS of IntGC are studied. Int2GC can be seen as a fusion of two IntGC logics, and Int2GC+FS is obtained from Int2GC by adding instances of duality-like connections $\Diamond(A \to\ B) \to (\Box A \to \Diamond B)$ and $(\Diamond A \to \Box B) \to \Box(A \to B)$, introduced by G. Fischer Servi (Rend. Sem. Mat. Univers. Politecn. Torino, 42:179-194, 1984), for interlinking the two Galois connections of Int2GC. Both Kripke-style and algebraic semantics are presented for Int2GC and Int2GC+FS, and the logics are proved to be complete with respect to both of these semantics. We show that rough lattice-valued fuzzy sets defined on complete Heyting algebras are proper algebraic models for Int2GC+FS. We also prove that Int2GC+FS is equivalent to the intuitionistic tense logic IKt, and an axiomatisation of IKt with the number of axioms reduced to the half of the number of axioms given by W. B. Ewald (J. Symb. Log, 51:166-179, 1986) is presented.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.