Paper detail

Introducing the THESAN project: radiation-magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the epoch of reionization

We introduce the THESAN project, a suite of large volume (L = 95.5 cMpc) radiation-magnetohydrodynamic simulations that simultaneously model the large-scale statistical properties of the IGM during reionization and the resolved characteristics of the galaxies responsible for it. The flagship simulation has dark matter (DM) and baryonic mass resolutions of $3.1 \times 10^6$ $M_\odot$ and $5.8 \times 10^5 $ $M_\odot$, respectively. The gravitational forces are softened on scales of 2.2 ckpc with the smallest cell sizes reaching 10 pc at z=5.5, enabling predictions down to the atomic cooling limit. The simulations use an efficient radiation hydrodynamics solver (AREPO-RT) that precisely captures the interaction between ionizing photons and gas, coupled to well-tested galaxy formation (IllustrisTNG) and dust models to accurately predict the properties of galaxies. Through a complementary set of medium resolution simulations we investigate the changes to reionization introduced by different assumptions for ionizing escape fractions, varying DM models, and numerical convergence. The simulations produce realistic reionization histories that match the observed evolution of the global neutral hydrogen fraction and electron scattering optical depth to reionization. They also match a wealth of high-redshift observationally inferred data, including the stellar-to-halo-mass relation, stellar mass function, star formation rate density, and the mass-metallicity relation, despite the galaxy formation model being mainly calibrated at z=0. We demonstrate that different reionization models give rise to varied bubble size distributions that imprint unique signatures on the 21cm emission, especially on the slope of the power spectrum at large spatial scales, enabling current and upcoming 21cm experiments to accurately characterise the sources that dominate the ionizing photon budget. [abridged]

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.