Paper detail

Introducing the Search for Intermediate-mass Black-hole In Nearby Galaxy (SIBLING) Survey

Intermediate mass black holes (IMBHs) have masses between the $10^2\!-\!10^6$ M$_\odot$ and are key to our understanding of the formation of massive black holes. The known population of IMBH remains small, with a few hundred candidates and only a handful of them confirmed as bona-fide IMBHs. Until now, the most widely used selection method is based on spectral analysis. Here we present a methodology to select IMBH candidates via optical variability analysis of the nuclear region of local galaxies ($z \leqslant 0.35$). Active IMBH accreting at low rates show small amplitude variability with time scales of hours, as it is seen in one of the known IMBH NGC4395. We found a sample of $\sim \!500$ galaxies evidencing fast and small amplitude variation in their weekly based light curves. We estimate an average occupancy fraction of 4\% and a surface density of $\sim \!3$ deg$^{-2}$, which represent an increase by a factor of $\sim\!40$ compared to previous searches. A large fraction ($78\%$) of the candidates are in spiral galaxies. We preliminary confirm the AGN nature of 22 sources via BPT diagrams using SDSS legacy spectra. Further confirmation of these candidates will require multiwavelength observations, especially in X-ray and radio bands.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.