Introducing a New Spitzer Master BLISS Map to Remove the Instrument-Systematic -- Phase-Curve-Parameter Degeneracy, as Demonstrated by a Reanalysis of the 4.5μmμm WASP-43b Phase Curve

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Abstract

While Spitzer IRAC systematics are generally well understood, each data set can provide its own challenges that continue to teach us about the underlying functional form of these systematics. Multiple groups have analyzed the phase curves of WASP-43b with varying detrending techniques, each obtaining different results. In this work, we take another look at WASP-43b while exploring the degenerate relation between Bilinearly-Interpolated Subpixel Sensitivity (BLISS) mapping, point response function full width at half-maximum (PRF-FWHM) detrending, and phase curve parameters. We find that there is a strong correlation between the detrending parameters in the two models, and best fit phase curve amplitudes vary strongly when the data are temporally binned. To remove this degeneracy, we present a new Gaussian centroided intrapixel sensitivity map (hereafter fixed sensitivity map), generated using 3,712,830 exposures spanning 5 years, for a variety of aperture sizes at 4.5μmμm. We find evidence for time variability in the sensitivity at 3.6μmμm and do not generate a visit-independent map for this channel. With the fixed 4.5 μmμm intrapixel sensitivity map, the best fits for WASP-43b no longer vary strongly with bin size and PRF-FWHM detrending is no longer required to remove correlated noise. For data sets that do not fall completely within the sweet spot, temporal binning should not be used in the analysis of Spitzer phase curves. We confirm night side emission for WASP-43b with a disk integrated nightside temperature of 806 ±\pm 48 K at 4.5μmμm. The 4.5μmμm maps are available at \url{github.com/kevin218/POET}

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.