Paper detail

Intrinsic structure perspective for MIPS interfaces in two dimensional systems of Active Brownian Particles

Suspensions of Active Brownian Particles (ABP) undergo motility induced phase separation (MIPS) over a wide range of mean density and activity strength [1], even in the absence of an explicit attraction. Negative values of the mechanical surface tension have been reported, from the total forces across the interface, while the stable fluctuations of the interfacial line would be interpreted as a positive capillary surface tension [2], while in equilibrium liquid surfaces these two magnitudes are equal. We present here the analysis of 2D-ABP interfaces in terms of the intrinsic density and force profiles, calculated with the particle distance to the instantaneous interfacial line. Our results provide a new insight in the origin of the MIPS from the local rectification of the random active force on the particles near the interface. As it had been pointed, that effect acts as an external potential [3] that produces a pressure gradient across the interface, so that the mechanical surface tension of the MIPS cannot be described as that of equilibrium coexisting phases; but our analysis shows that most of that effect comes from the tightly caged particles at the dense (inner) side of the MIPS interface, rather than from the free moving particles at the outer side that collide with the dense cluster. Moreover, a clear correlation appears between the decay of the hexatic order parameter at the dense slab and the end of the MIPS as the strength of the active force is lowered. We test that with the strong active forces required for MIPS, the interfacial structure and properties are very similar for ABP with purely repulsive (WCA-LJ model truncated at its minimum) and when the interaction includes a range of the LJ attractive force.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.