Paper detail

Intrinsic Morphology of Ultra-diffuse Galaxies

With the published data of apparent axis ratios for 1109 ultra-diffuse galaxies (UDGs) located in 17 low-redshift (z~ 0.020 - 0.063) galaxy clusters and 84 UDGs in 2 intermediate-redshift (z~ 0.308 - 0.348) clusters, we take advantage of a Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach and assume a ubiquitous triaxial model to investigate the intrinsic morphologies of UDGs. In contrast to the conclusion of Burkert (2017), i.e., the underlying shapes of UDGs are purely prolate ($C=B<A$), we find that the data favor the oblate-triaxial models ($C<B\lesssim A$) over the nearly prolate ones. We also find that the intrinsic morphologies of UDGs are relevant to their stellar masses/luminosities, environments, and redshifts. First, for the low-redshift UDGs in the same environment, the more-luminous ones are always thicker than the less-luminous counterparts, possibly due to the more voilent internal supernovae feedback or external tidal interactions for the progenitors of the more-luminous UDGs. The UDG thickness dependence on luminosity is distinct from that of the typical quiescent dwarf ellipticals (dEs) and dwarf spheroidals (dSphs) in the local clusters and groups, but resembles that of massive galaxies; in this sense, UDGs may not be simply treated as an extension of the dE/dSph class with similar evolutionary histories. Second, for the low-redshift UDGs within the same luminosity range, the ones with smaller cluster-centric distances are more puffed-up, probably attributed to tidal interactions. Finally, the intermediate-redshift cluster UDGs are more flattened, which plausibly suggests a `disky&#39; origin for high-redshift, initial UDGs.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.