Paper detail

Interpreting the AXP 1E 2259+586 antiglitch as a change in internal magnetization

The sudden spin-down event ('anti-glitch') observed in AXP 1E 2259+586 on 2012 April 21 was arguably caused by a decay of its internal toroidal magnetic field component, which turns a stable prolate configuration into an unstable one. We refine previous models of this process by modelling the star's magnetic field self-consistently as a 'twisted torus' configuration in non-barotropic equilibrium (which allows us to explore a greater range of equilibrium configurations). It is shown that, if the star's magnetic field is purely dipolar, the change in the toroidal field strength required to produce an anti-glitch of the observed size can be ~ 10 times larger than previously calculated. If the star has a quadrupolar magnetic field component, then an anti-glitch of similar magnitude can be produced via a decay of the quadrupole component, in addition to a decay of the toroidal component. We show that, if the quadrupole component decays, the minimum initial toroidal field strength and the change in toroidal field strength needed to produce the observed anti-glitch are lower than in the pure dipole twisted torus. In addition, we predict the maximum anti-glitch sizes, assuming that they are caused by a change in ellipticity, in four glitching magnetars and discuss the implications for energetics of accompanying X-ray bursts.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.