Paper detail

Interpretation of the expansion law of planetary nebulae

We reproduce the expansion velocity--radius ($V_{\rm{exp}}$--$R_{\rm{n}}$) relation in planetary nebulae by considering a simple dynamical model, in order to investigate the dynamical evolution and formation of planetary nebulae. In our model, the planetary nebula is formed and evolving by interaction of a fast wind from the central star with a slow wind from its progenitor, the AGB star. In particular, taking account of the mass loss history of the AGB star makes us succeed in the reproduction of the observed $V_{\rm{exp}}$-$R_{\rm{n}}$ sequence. As a result, examining the ensemble of the observational and theoretical evolution models of PNe, we find that if the AGB star pulsates and its mass loss rate changes with time (from $\sim 10^{-6.4}M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ to $\sim 10^{-5}M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$), the model agrees with the observations. In terms of observation, we suggest that there are few planetary nebulae with larger expansion velocity and smaller radius because the evolutionary time-scale of such nebulae is so short and the size of nebulae is so compact that it is difficult for us to observe them.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.