Paper detail

Interpretation of Pioneer 10 Lyman alpha based on heliospheric interface models: methodology and first results

The Very Local Interstellar Medium (VLISM) neutral hydrogen and proton densities are still not precisely known even after three decades of deep space research and the existence of the EUV and other diagnostic data obtained by Pioneer 10/11, Voyager 1/2 and other spacecraft. The EUV data interpretation, in particular, has suffered because of inadequate neutral hydrogen-plasma models, difficulty of calculating the multiply scattered Lyman alpha glow and calibration uncertainties. Recently, all these difficulties have been significantly reduced. In the present work we have used the latest state of the art supersonic VLISM neutral hydrogen-plasma and Monte Carlo radiative transfer model, incorporating neutral density, temperature, and velocity variations, actual solar line shape, realistic redistribution function, Doppler and aberration effects. This work presents the methodology of the radiative transfer code and the first results of the comparison of the model predictions with the Pioneer 10 data. Monte Carlo radiative transfer calculations were carried out for five neutral hydrogen- plasma models and compared with Pioneer data. The first results are quite encouraging. We found that the VLISM ionization ratio is between 0.2 and 0.5 and that the VLISM neutral hydrogen density is less than 0.25 cm^{-3}. The present calculation suggests that the Pioneer 10 photometer derived intensities (Rayleighs) need to be increased by a factor of 2. If this model- derived calibration is used then the difference between Pioneer 10 and Voyager 2 intensity values is reduced to about 2.2. The model, neutral hydrogen density = 0.15 cm${-3} and proton density = 0.07 cm^{-3}, is found to best fit the Pioneer 10 data.

preprint2002arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.