Paper detail

Interpretation of Mössbauer experiment in a rotating system: a new proof for general relativity

A historical experiment by Kündig on the transverse Doppler shift in a rotating system measured with the Mössbauer effect has been recently first re-analyzed and then replied [1,2]. The results have shown that a correct re-processing of Kündig's experimental data gives a deviation of a relative redshift between emission and absorption resonant lines from the prediction due to relativistic dilatation of time, which, at first-order in \frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}}, gives a redshift \frac{\nabla E}{E}\simeq-\frac{1}{2}\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}} where v is the tangential velocity of the absorber of resonant radiationa and c is the velocity of light in vacuum. Data re-processing gave \frac{\nabla E}{E}\simeq-k\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}} with k=0.596\pm0.006. Subsequent new experimental results [2] have shown a redshift with k=0.68\pm0.03 instead. Using Einstein Equivalence Principle on the equivalence between the gravitational "force" and the pseudo-force experienced by an observer in a rotating frame of reference, here we re-analyze the theoretical framework of Mössbauer rotor experiments directly in the rotating frame through a general relativistic treatment. We show that previous analyses missed an important effect of clock synchronization and that the correct general relativistic prevision in the rotating frame gives k\simeq\frac{2}{3} in perfect agreement with the new experimental results. Such an effect of clock synchronization has been missed in various papers in the literature with some subsequent claim of invalidity of relativity theory and/or some attempts to explain the experimental results through "exotic" effects. Our general relativistic interpretation shows, instead, that the new experimental results of the Mössbauer rotor experiment are a new, strong and independent, proof of general relativity. Finally, we discuss an analogy with the use of general relativity in Global Positioning Systems.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.