Paper detail

Interpolation by generalized exponential sums with equal weights

Here we solve Padé and Prony interpolation problems for the generalized exponential sums with equal weights: $$H_n(z; h)=\fracμ{n}\sum_{k=1}^n h(λ_k z),\quad \text{where}\quad μ,λ_k\in \mathbb{C},$$ and $h$ is a fixed analytic function under few natural assumptions. The interpolation of a function $f$ by $H_n$ is due to properly chosen $μ$ and $\{λ_k\}_{k=1}^n$, which depend on $f$, $h$ and $n$. The sums $H_n$ are related to the $h$-sums and generalized exponential sums, i.e. to $$\mathcal{H}^*_n(z; h)=\sum_{k=1}^n λ_k h(λ_k z)\quad \text{and}\quad\mathcal{H}_n(z; h):=\sum_{k=1}^n μ_k h(λ_k z),\quad \text{where}\quad μ_k,λ_k\in \mathbb{C},$$ which generalize many classical approximants and whose properties are actively studied. As for the Padé problem, we show that $H_n$ and $\mathcal{H}_n^*$ have similar constructions and rates of interpolation, whereas calculating $H_n$ requires less arithmetic operations. Although the Padé problem for $\mathcal{H}_n$ is known to have a doubled interpolation rate with respect to $\mathcal{H}_n^*$ and thus to $H_n$, it can be however unsolvable in many useful cases and this may entirely eliminate the advantage of $\mathcal{H}_n$. We show that, in contrast to $\mathcal{H}_n$, the Padé problem for $H_n$ always has a unique solution. More importantly, we also obtain efficient estimates for $μ$ and $λ_k$, valuable by themselves, and use them in further evaluating interpolation quality and in applications. The Padé problem and estimates provide a basis for managing the more interesting Prony problem for exponential sums with equal weights $H_n(z;\exp)$, i.e. when $h(z)=\exp(z)$. We show that it is uniquely solvable and surprisingly $μ$ and $λ_k$ can be efficiently estimated. This is in sharp contrast to the case of well-known exponential sums $\mathcal{H}_n(z;\exp)$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.