Paper detail

Interplay between the Beale-Kato-Majda theorem and the analyticity-strip method to investigate numerically the incompressible Euler singularity problem

Numerical simulations of the incompressible Euler equations are performed using the Taylor-Green vortex initial conditions and resolutions up to $4096^3$. The results are analyzed in terms of the classical analyticity strip method and Beale, Kato and Majda (BKM) theorem. A well-resolved acceleration of the time-decay of the width of the analyticity strip $δ(t)$ is observed at the highest resolution for $3.7<t<3.85$ while preliminary 3D visualizations show the collision of vortex sheets. The BKM criterium on the power-law growth of supremum of the vorticity, applied on the same time-interval, is not inconsistent with the occurrence of a singularity around $t \simeq 4$. These new findings lead us to investigate how fast the analyticity strip width needs to decrease to zero in order to sustain a finite-time singularity consistent with the BKM theorem. A new simple bound of the supremum norm of vorticity in terms of the energy spectrum is introduced and used to combine the BKM theorem with the analyticity-strip method. It is shown that a finite-time blowup can exist only if $δ(t)$ vanishes sufficiently fast at the singularity time. In particular, if a power law is assumed for $δ(t)$ then its exponent must be greater than some critical value, thus providing a new test that is applied to our $4096^3$ Taylor-Green numerical simulation. Our main conclusion is that the numerical results are not inconsistent with a singularity but that higher-resolution studies are needed to extend the time-interval on which a well-resolved power-law behavior of $δ(t)$ takes place, and check whether the new regime is genuine and not simply a crossover to a faster exponential decay.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.