Paper detail

Interplay between superconductivity and non-Fermi liquid at a quantum-critical point in a metal. IV: The $γ$ model and its phase diagram at $1<γ<2$

In this paper we continue our analysis of the interplay between the pairing and the non-Fermi liquid behavior in a metal for a set of quantum-critical (QC) systems with an effective dynamical electron-electron interaction $V(Ω_m) \propto 1/|Ω_m|^γ$ (the $γ$-model). In previous papers we studied the cases $0<γ<1$ and $γ\approx 1$. We argued that the pairing by a gapless boson is fundamentally different from BCS/Eliashberg pairing by a massive boson as for the former there exists an infinite number of topologically distinct solutions for the gap function $Δ_n (ω_m)$ at $T=0$ ($n=0,1,2...$), each with its own condensation energy $E_{c,n}$. Here we extend the analysis to larger $1< γ<2$. We argue that the discrete set of solutions survives, and the spectrum of $E_{c,n}$ gets progressively denser as $γ$ approaches $2$ and eventually becomes continuous at $γ\to 2$. This increases the strength of &#34;longitudinal&#34; gap fluctuations, which tend to reduce the actual superconducting $T_c$ and give rise to a pseudogap region of preformed pairs. We also detect two features on the real axis for $γ>1$ which become critical at $γ\to 2$. First, the density of states evolves towards a set of discrete $δ-$functions. Second, an array of dynamical vortices emerges in the upper frequency half-plane. These two features come about because on a real axis, the real part of the interaction, $V&#39; (Ω) \propto \cos(πγ/2)/|Ω|^γ$, becomes repulsive for $γ>1$, and the imaginary $V^{&#39;&#39;} (Ω) \propto \sin(πγ/2)/|Ω|^γ$, gets progressively smaller at $γ\to 2$. The features on the real axis are consistent with the development of a continuum spectrum of $E_{c,n}$ obtained using $Δ_n (ω_m)$ on the Matsubara axis. We consider the case $γ=2$ separately in the next paper.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.