Paper detail

Internal Structure and CO$_2$ Reservoirs of Habitable Water-Worlds

Water-worlds are water-rich (>1 wt% H$_2$O) exoplanets. The classical models of water-worlds considered layered structures determined by the phase boundaries of pure water. However, water-worlds are likely to possess comet-like compositions, with between ~3 mol% to 30 mol% CO$_2$ relative to water. In this study, we build an interior structure model of habitable (i.e. surface-liquid-ocean-bearing) water-worlds using the latest results from experimental data on the CO$_2$-H$_2$O system, to explore the CO$_2$ budget and to localize the main CO$_2$ reservoirs inside of these planets. We show that CO$_2$ dissolved in the ocean and trapped inside of a clathrate layer cannot accommodate a cometary amount of CO$_2$ if the planet accretes more than 11 wt% of volatiles (CO$_2$ + H$_2$O) during its formation. We propose a new, potentially dominant, CO$_2$ reservoir for water-worlds: CO$_2$ buried inside of the high-pressure water ice mantle as CO$_2$ ices or (H$_2$CO$_3$ . H$_2$O), monohydrate of carbonic acid. If insufficient amounts of CO$_2$ are sequestered either in this reservoir or the planet's iron core, habitable zone water-worlds could generically be stalled in their cooling before liquid oceans have a chance to condense.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.