Paper detail

Internal relation between Personality trait Statistical outcomes among Junior College Divers and their performance

Objective: Personality trait can predict divers' behavioral performance underwater. However, we know very little about the innate personality of the junior college diving students. To gain a better insight of personality characteristics of them, we carried out a personality survey base on Eysenck questionnaire. Method: 93 college diving students participated in this survey and totally 74 valid questionnaires recovered. Four dimensions were rating by the self-report scale of 85 questions. Descriptive analysis, T test and variance analyses are processing by SPSS20.0. Results: Statistical results indicated that college divers are more extraverted (t=10.838, p=0.000), more neurotic (t=2.747, p=0.008) and unlikely psychoticism (t=-1.332, p=0.187). Differences were found in Gender only in Liar scale score (F=7.025, p=0.010). Conclusion: These outcomes suggested that parts of the character of the college divers' are suitable for diving activities. And emotional control training is needed in the curriculum setting for them in the process of safe diving.

preprint2018arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.