Paper detail

Intermittent Status Updating Through Joint Scheduling of Sensing and Retransmissions

Consider an energy harvesting node where generation of a status update message takes non-negligible time due to sensing, computing and analytics operations performed before making update transmissions. The node has to harmonize its (re)transmission strategy with the sensing/computing. We call this general set of problems intermittent status updating. In this paper, we consider intermittent status updating through non-preemptive sensing/computing (S/C) and transmission (Tx) operations, each costing a single energy recharge of the node, through an erasure channel with (a) perfect channel feedback and (b) no channel feedback. The S/C time for each update is independent with a general distribution. The Tx queue has a single data buffer to save the latest packet generated after the S/C operation and a single transmitter where transmission time is deterministic. Once energy is harvested, the node has to decide whether to activate S/C to generate a new update or to (re)send the existing update (if any) to the receiver. We prove that when feedback is available average peak age of information (AoI) at the receiver is minimized by a threshold-based policy that allows only young packets to be (re)sent or else generates a new update. We additionally propose window based and probabilistic retransmission schemes for both cases (a) and (b) and obtain closed form average peak AoI expressions. Our numerical results show average peak AoI performance comparisons and improvements.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.