Paper detail

Intermittency and collisions of fast sedimenting droplets in turbulence

We study theoretically and numerically spatial distribution and collision rate of droplets that sediment in homogeneous isotropic Navier-Stokes turbulence. It is assumed that typical turbulent accelerations of fluid particles are much smaller than gravity. This was shown to imply that the particles interact weakly with individual vortices and, as a result, form a smooth flow in most of the space. In weakly intermittent turbulence with moderate Reynolds number, rare regions where the flow breaks down can be neglected in the calculation of space averaged rate of droplet collisions. However, increase of Re increases probability of rare, large quiescent vortices whose long coherent interaction with the particles destroys the flow. Thus at higher Re the space averaged collision rate forms in rare regions where the assumption of smooth flow breaks down. We describe the transition between the regimes and provide collision kernel in the case of moderate Re describable by the flow. The distribution of pairwise distances is shown to obey a separable dependence on the magnitude and the polar angle of the separation vector. Magnitude dependence obeys a power-law with a negative exponent, manifesting multifractality of the droplet's attractor. We provide the so far missing numerical confirmation of a relation between this exponent and the Lyapunov exponents and demonstrate that it holds beyond the theoretical range. The angular dependence of the RDF exhibits a maximum at small angles quantifying particle's formation of spatial columns. We derive the droplet's collision kernel using that in the considered limit the gradients of droplet's flow are Gaussian. We demonstrate that as Re increases the column's aspect ratio decreases, eventually becoming one when the isotropy is restored. We propose how the theory could be constructed at higher Re of clouds by using the example of the RDF.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.