Paper detail

Intermediate-to-Low Mass Stars in Open Clusters and the Evolution of Li

Open clusters (OC) of 1-3 Gyr age contain intermediate-to-low-mass stars in evolutionary phases of multiple relevance to understanding Li evolution. Stars leaving the main sequence (MS) from the hot side of the Lithium dip (LD) at a fixed age can include a range of mass, varying degrees of core degeneracy, and helium ignition under quiescent or flash conditions. An ongoing survey of a significant sample of stars from the giant branch to below the LD in key open clusters has revealed patterns that supply critical clues to the underlying source of Li variation among stars of differing mass and age. While the LD is well established in OC of this age, stars on the hot side of the LD can exhibit Li ranging from the apparent primordial cluster value to upper limits similar to those found at the LD center, despite occupying the same region of the color-magnitude diagram (CMD). Stars on the first-ascent giant branch show a dramatic decline in measurable Li that correlates strongly with increasing age and reduced turnoff mass. We discuss how these trends can be explained in the context of the existence of the LD itself and the temporal evolution of individual stars.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.