Paper detail

Intermediate scales in non-supersymmetric SO(10) grand unified theories

It is often argued that in the class of non-supersymmetric SO(10) grand unified theories there is barely any room for reconciling the lower bound on the position of the GUT scale emerging from the proton decay searches and the lower limit on the absolute neutrino mass scale derived from the neutrino oscillation experiments with the gauge coupling unification constraints. The recent two-loop reassessment of the gauge running provides the first complete picture of the situation, complementing the existing studies in several aspects. The improved analysis reveals a new room in the parametric space that could support a class of non-supersymmetric SO(10) models potentially compatible with all current physical data, including constraints on the relevant Yukawa sector emerging from the quark and lepton masses and mixings. This, in turn, brings back the question of viability of some of the simplest non-supersymmetric GUT scenarios.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.