Paper detail

Interlacings for random walks on weighted graphs and the interchange process

We study Aldous' conjecture that the spectral gap of the interchange process on a weighted undirected graph equals the spectral gap of the random walk on this graph. We present a conjecture in the form of an inequality, and prove that this inequality implies Aldous' conjecture by combining an interlacing result for Laplacians of random walks on weighted graphs with representation theory. We prove the conjectured inequality for several important instances. As an application of the developed theory, we prove Aldous' conjecture for a large class of weighted graphs, which includes all wheel graphs, all graphs with four vertices, certain nonplanar graphs, certain graphs with several weighted cycles of arbitrary length, as well as all trees. Caputo, Liggett, and Richthammer have recently resolved Aldous' conjecture, after independently and simultaneously discovering the key ideas developed in the present paper.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.