Paper detail

Interlacing and scaling exponents for the geodesic watermelon in last passage percolation

In discrete planar last passage percolation (LPP), random values are assigned independently to each vertex in $\mathbb Z^2$, and each finite upright path in $\mathbb Z^2$ is ascribed the weight given by the sum of values of its vertices. The weight of a collection of disjoint paths is the sum of its members' weights. The notion of a geodesic, a maximum weight path between two vertices, has a natural generalization concerning several disjoint paths: a $k$-geodesic watermelon in $[1,n]^2\cap\mathbb Z^2$ is a collection of $k$ disjoint paths contained in this square that has maximum weight among all such collections. While the weights of such collections are known to be important objects, the maximizing paths have been largely unexplored beyond the $k=1$ case. For exactly solvable models, such as exponential and geometric LPP, it is well known that for $k=1$ the exponents that govern fluctuation in weight and transversal distance are $1/3$ and $2/3$; that is, typically, the weight of the geodesic on the route $(1,1) \to (n,n)$ fluctuates around a dominant linear growth of the form $μn$ by the order of $n^{1/3}$; and the maximum Euclidean distance of the geodesic from the diagonal has order $n^{2/3}$. Assuming a strong but local form of convexity and one-point moderate deviation bounds for the geodesic weight profile---which are available in all known exactly solvable models---we establish that, typically, the $k$-geodesic watermelon's weight falls below $μnk$ by order $k^{5/3}n^{1/3}$, and its transversal fluctuation is of order $k^{1/3}n^{2/3}$. Our arguments crucially rely on, and develop, a remarkable deterministic interlacing property that the watermelons admit. Our methods also yield sharp rigidity estimates for naturally associated point processes, which improve on estimates obtained via tools from the theory of determinantal point processes available in the integrable setting.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.