Paper detail

Interference of Topologically Protected Edge States in Silicene Nanoribbons

Silicene is a two-dimensional quantum spin-Hall insulator. We study the edge channels of silicene nanoribbons from the viewpoint of the topological protection and the interference between the two edges. It is found that the behaviors of the helical edge channels (HECs) are completely different between the armchair and zigzag edges. The penetration depths $ξ$ of the HEC is antiproportional to the spin-orbit gap for the armchair edge $ξ_{\rm arm} \sim \hbar v_\text{F}/ Δ$ ($v_\text{F}$: the Fermi velocity, $Δ$: the gap due to the spin-orbit interaction), while it remains as short as the lattice constant for the zigzag edge. Zero-energy states disappear in armchair nanoribbons due to an interference of two edge states, while they remains in zigzag nanoribbons even if the width $W$ is quite narrow. The gap $δ$ of HECs behaves as $δ\sim \hbar v_\text{F}/W$ for $Δ=0$, and as $δ\sim Δ\exp[- W/ξ_{\rm arm}]$ for $Δ\not=0$ for armchair nanoribbons, while it remains essentially zero irrespectively of $Δ$ for zigzag nanoribbons.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.