Paper detail

Interference Coordination: Random Clustering and Adaptive Limited Feedback

Interference coordination improves data rates and reduces outages in cellular networks. Accurately evaluating the gains of coordination, however, is contingent upon using a network topology that models realistic cellular deployments. In this paper, we model the base stations locations as a Poisson point process to provide a better analytical assessment of the performance of coordination. Since interference coordination is only feasible within clusters of limited size, we consider a random clustering process where cluster stations are located according to a random point process and groups of base stations associated with the same cluster coordinate. We assume channel knowledge is exchanged among coordinating base stations, and we analyze the performance of interference coordination when channel knowledge at the transmitters is either perfect or acquired through limited feedback. We apply intercell interference nulling (ICIN) to coordinate interference inside the clusters. The feasibility of ICIN depends on the number of antennas at the base stations. Using tools from stochastic geometry, we derive the probability of coverage and the average rate for a typical mobile user. We show that the average cluster size can be optimized as a function of the number of antennas to maximize the gains of ICIN. To minimize the mean loss in rate due to limited feedback, we propose an adaptive feedback allocation strategy at the mobile users. We show that adapting the bit allocation as a function of the signals' strength increases the achievable rate with limited feedback, compared to equal bit partitioning. Finally, we illustrate how this analysis can help solve network design problems such as identifying regions where coordination provides gains based on average cluster size, number of antennas, and number of feedback bits.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.