Paper detail

Interference as Noise: Friend or Foe?

This paper shows that for the two-user Gaussian Interference Channel (G-IC) Treating Interference as Noise without Time Sharing (TINnoTS) achieves the closure of the capacity region to within either a constant gap, or to within a gap of the order O(logln(min(S,I))) where S is the largest Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) on the direct links and I is the largest Interference to Noise Ratio (INR) on the cross links. As a consequence, TINnoTS is optimal from a generalized Degrees of Freedom (gDoF) perspective for all channel gains except for a subset of zero measure. TINnoTS with Gaussian inputs is known to be optimal to within 1/2 bit for a subset of the weak interference regime. Surprisingly, this paper shows that TINnoTS is gDoG optimal in all parameter regimes, even in the strong and very strong interference regimes where joint decoding of Gaussian inputs is optimal. For approximate optimality of TINnoTS in all parameter regimes it is critical to use non-Gaussian inputs. This work thus proposes to use mixed inputs as channel inputs where a mixed input is the sum of a discrete and a Gaussian random variable. Interestingly, compared to the Han-Kobayashi inner bound, the discrete part of a mixed input is shown to effectively act as a common message in the sense that, although treated as noise, its effect on the achievable rate region is as if it were jointly decoded together with the desired messages at a non-intended receiver. The practical implication is that a discrete interfering input is a 'friend', while a Gaussian interfering input is in general a 'foe'. Since TINnoTS requires neither joint decoding nor time sharing, the results of this paper are applicable to a variety of oblivions or asynchronous channels, such as the block asynchronous G-IC (which is not an information stable) and the G-IC with partial codebook knowledge at one or more receivers.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.