Paper detail

Interfacial tension and a three-phase generalized self-consistent theory of non-dilute soft composite solids

In the dilute limit Eshelby's inclusion theory captures the behavior of a wide range of systems and properties. However, because Eshelby's approach neglects interfacial stress, it breaks down in soft materials as the inclusion size approaches the elastocapillarity length $L$. Here, we use a three-phase generalized self-consistent method to calculate the elastic moduli of composites comprised of an isotropic, linear-elastic compliant solid hosting a spatially random monodisperse distribution of spherical liquid droplets. As opposed to similar approaches, we explicitly capture the liquid-solid interfacial stress when it is treated as an isotropic, strain-independent surface tension. Within this framework, the composite stiffness depends solely on the ratio of the elastocapillarity length $L$ to the inclusion radius $R$. Independent of inclusion volume fraction, we find that the composite is stiffened by the inclusions whenever $R < 3L/2$. Over the same range of parameters, we compare our results with alternative approaches (dilute and Mori-Tanaka theories that include surface tension). Our framework can be easily extended to calculate the composite properties of more general soft materials where surface tension plays a role.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.