Paper detail

Interfacial interactions between local defects in amorphous SiO$_2$ and supported graphene

We present a density functional study of graphene adhesion on a realistic SiO$_2$ surface taking into account van der Waals (vdW) interactions. The SiO$_2$ substrate is modeled at the local scale by using two main types of surface defects, typical for amorphous silica: the oxygen dangling bond and three-coordinated silicon. The results show that the nature of adhesion between graphene and its substrate is qualitatively dependent on the surface defect type. In particular, the interaction between graphene and silicon-terminated SiO$_2$ originates exclusively from the vdW interaction, whereas the oxygen-terminated surface provides additional ionic contribution to the binding arising from interfacial charge transfer ($p$-type doping of graphene). Strong doping contrast for the different surface terminations provides a mechanism for the charge inhomogeneity of graphene on amorphous SiO$_2$ observed in experiments. We found that independent of the considered surface morphologies, the typical electronic structure of graphene in the vicinity of the Dirac point remains unaltered in contact with the SiO$_2$ substrate, which points to the absence of the covalent interactions between graphene and amorphous silica. The case of hydrogen-passivated SiO$_2$ surfaces is also examined. In this situation, the binding with graphene is practically independent of the type of surface defects and arises, as expected, from the vdW interactions. Finally, the interface distances obtained are shown to be in good agreement with recent experimental studies.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.