Paper detail

Interestingness Measure for Mining Spatial Gene Expression Data using Association Rule

The search for interesting association rules is an important topic in knowledge discovery in spatial gene expression databases. The set of admissible rules for the selected support and confidence thresholds can easily be extracted by algorithms based on support and confidence, such as Apriori. However, they may produce a large number of rules, many of them are uninteresting. The challenge in association rule mining (ARM) essentially becomes one of determining which rules are the most interesting. Association rule interestingness measures are used to help select and rank association rule patterns. Besides support and confidence, there are other interestingness measures, which include generality reliability, peculiarity, novelty, surprisingness, utility, and applicability. In this paper, the application of the interesting measures entropy and variance for association pattern discovery from spatial gene expression data has been studied. In this study the fast mining algorithm has been used which produce candidate itemsets and it spends less time for calculating k-supports of the itemsets with the Boolean matrix pruned, and it scans the database only once and needs less memory space. Experimental results show that using entropy as the measure of interest for the spatial gene expression data has more diverse and interesting rules.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.