Paper detail

Interesting Features in the Combined GALEX and Sloan Color Diagrams of Solar-like Galactic Populations

We report on intriguing photometric properties of Galactic stars observed in the GALEX satellite's far-UV and near-UV bandbasses as well as from the SDSS survey and the Kepler Input Catalog. First, the FUV-NUV color distribution of stars in the Kepler field consists of 2 distinct peaks. Second, curiously, for stars with spectral types G or later the mean FUV-NUV color becomes much bluer, contrary to expectation. we have found in two samples of mid-F through K type stars that ~14-18% of them exhibit FUV-excesses relative to their NUV fluxes and spectral types. Nearly the same fractions are also discovered among members of the Kepler Eclipsing Binary Catalog and in the published list of Kepler Objects of Interest. These UV-excess ("UVe") colors are confirmed by the UV continuum slopes in GALEX spectra. The SDSS spectra of some UVe stars exhibit metallic line weakening especially in the blue. This suggests an enhanced contribution of UV flux relative to photospheric flux of a solar-type single star. We consider the possibility that the UV excesses originate from various types of hot stars, including binaries, and strong chromosphere stars that. Our model atmosphere-derived simulations of colors for binaries with main sequence pairs with a hot secondary demonstrate that the color loci conflict with the observed sequence. We are left with the active chromospheres explanation, whether in active binaries or young stars, as a still tentative explanation for the UVe stars. We also address the presence of an island of "UV red" stars in the NUV-g, g-i color diagram. The subpopulation comprising this island are mainly horizontal branch stars. These objects do not exhibit UV excesses and therefore have UV colors typical for their spectral types. This subpopulation appears "red" in the UV because their colors are not pulled to the blue by the UVe stars.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.