Paper detail

Interbreeding conditions for explaining Neandertal DNA in living humans: the nonneutral case

We consider here an extension of a previous work by Neves and Serva, still unpublished, which estimates the amount of interbreeding between anatomically modern Africans and Neandertals necessary for explaining the experimental fact that 1 to 4% of the DNA in non-African living humans is of Neandertal origin. In that work we considered that Africans and Neandertals had the same fitness (neutral hypothesis) and Neandertal extinction was thus an event of fortune. In this work we consider that Africans had larger fitnesses. We show results for four values for the fitness difference: 1%, 5%, 10% and 20% and compare them with the corresponding neutral results. Some technical differences with respect to the neutral case appear. We conclude that even with 1% fitness difference Neandertals extinction comes up in too small a time, so the neutral model looks more suitable for explaining the known data on occupation of some caves in Israel for a very long time, alternately by Africans and Neandertals.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.