Paper detail

Interactions between topological defects in (1+1) dimensions

In this thesis, we study interactions between topological defects in two-dimensional spacetimes. These defects are called kinks. They are solutions of scalar field theories with localized energy which propagate without losing its shape. In order to understand the resonance phenomenon exhibited by those models, we built a toy model where the kink's vibrational mode turns into a quasinormal mode. This causes the suppression of resonance windows and, consequently, its fractal structure is lost. Considering a higher order polynomial as the scalar field potential, we find kinks with long-range tails, which decay as a power law. We developed a numerical method to correctly initialize this systems and applied it to a scalar field model containing kinks with long-range tails in both sides. After the collision, the kink-antikink pair is annihilated for velocities below an ultra-relativistic critical velocity without bion formation. We also investigated a collision between wobbling kinks of the double sine-Gordon model. When the kinks are already wobbling before colliding, there appears resonance windows with separation after a single bounce. On the second half of the thesis, we focused on fermion-kink interactions. We studied what happens when a fermion binds to a wobbling kink. The result is that the fermion escapes from the kink as radiation and at a constant rate. This occurs if the energy gap between the initial state and the continuum threshold is not too large. Lastly, we investigated the interaction of a fermion with a background scalar field with an impurity that preserves half of the Bogomol'nyi-Prasad-Sommerfield (BPS) property. We found an adiabatic evolution near the BPS regime, which means that the system is at a static BPS solution at every moment.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.