Paper detail

Interaction between low-level jets and wind farms in a stable atmospheric boundary layer

Low-level jets (LLJs) are the wind maxima in the lower regions of the atmosphere with a high wind energy potential. Here we use large-eddy simulations to study the effect of LLJ height on the flow dynamics in a wind farm with $10\times4$ turbines. We change the LLJ height and atmospheric thermal stratification by varying the surface cooling rate. We find that the first row power production is higher in the presence of a LLJ compared to a neutral reference case without LLJ. Besides, we show that the first row power production increases with decreasing LLJ height. Due to the higher turbulence intensity, the wind turbine wakes recover faster in a neutral boundary layer than in a stably stratified one. However, for strong thermal stratification with a low-height LLJ, the wake recovery can be faster than for the neutral reference case as energy can be entrained from the LLJ. Flow visualizations reveal that under stable stratification the growth of wind farm's internal boundary layer is restricted and the wind flows around the wind farm. Wind farms extract energy from LLJs through wake meandering and turbulent entrainment depending on the LLJ height. Both effects are advantageous for wake recovery, which is beneficial for the performance of downwind turbines. This finding is confirmed by an energy budget analysis, which reveals a significant increase in the kinetic energy flux in the presence of a LLJ. The jet strength reduces as it passes through consecutive turbine rows. For strong stratification, the combined effect of buoyancy destruction and turbulence dissipation is larger than the turbulent entrainment. Therefore, the power production of turbines in the back of the wind farm is relatively low for strong atmospheric stratifications.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.