Paper detail

Interaction and breakup of droplet pairs in a microchannel Y-junction

We combine theory, numerical simulation and experiments to investigate the breakup of two identical droplets entering a Y-junction with controlled spatial offset by which the second droplet trails the first. Based on fully resolved 3D simulations, we describe the flow physics leading to breakup. Scaling arguments, numerical simulation and experiments consistently show that for small initial offset, breakup always occurs with the droplet fragment volume depending linearly on the offset. Above a critical offset, which increases with the capillary number, the droplets enter the constriction sequentially without breakup. Our results are relevant for understanding the breakup behavior in a dense emulsion flowing through a linearly converging channel leading to a constriction. Such geometry is commonly used for the serial interrogation of droplet content in droplet microfluidic applications, where droplet breakup can limit the maximum throughput for such process. For capillary numbers up to $Ca\simeq10^{-2}$, the results from the two-droplet system in a Y-junction are consistent with breakup observations in dense emulsions flowing through a linearly converging channel. The deterministic relation between initial offset and resulting breakup in the two-droplet system suggests that the stochasticity that is observed in the breakup of a dense emulsion arises from multi-droplet interactions. The numerical value of the prefactor in the linear relation between initial offset and droplet fragment volume determined from experiments differs slightly from the one extracted from fully resolved numerical simulations. This discrepancy suggests that even at very high bulk surfactant concentrations, the rate-limiting surfactant adsorption kinetics allows for Marangoni stresses to develop and modify the droplet dynamics.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.