Paper detail

Interacting galaxies in the IllustrisTNG simulations -- II: Star formation in the post-merger stage

Galaxy mergers are a major evolutionary transformation whose effects are borne out by a plethora of observations and numerical simulations. However, most previous simulations have used idealised, isolated, binary mergers and there has not been significant progress on studying statistical samples of galaxy mergers in large cosmological simulations. We present a sample of 27,691 post-merger (PM) galaxies ($0\le z \le 1$) identified from IllustrisTNG: a cosmological, large box, magneto-hydrodynamical simulation suite. The PM sample spans a wide range of merger and galaxy properties ($M_\star$, $μ$, $f_\mathrm{gas}$). We demonstrate that star forming (SF) PMs exhibit enhanced star formation rates (SFRs) on average by a factor of $\sim 2$, while the passive PMs show no statistical enhancement. We find that the SFR enhancements: (1) show no dependence on redshift, (2) anti-correlate with the PM's stellar mass, and (3) correlate with the gas fraction of the PM's progenitors. However, SF PMs show stronger enhancements which may indicate other processes being at play (e.g., gas phase, feedback efficiency). Although the SFR enhancement correlates mildly with the merger mass ratio, the more abundant minor mergers ($0.1 \le μ< 0.3 $) still contribute $\sim 50\%$ of the total SFR enhancement. By tracing the PM sample forward in time, we find that galaxy mergers can drive significant SFR enhancements which decay over $\sim 0.5$ Gyr independent of the merger mass ratio, although the decay timescale is dependent on the simulation resolution. The strongest merger-driven starburst galaxies evolve to be passive/quenched on faster timescales than their controls.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.