Paper detail

Interacting Faults in California and Hindu Kush

We study seismic fluctuations in California and Hindu Kush using Diffusion Entropy Analysis (DEA), a technique designed to detect the action of crucial events in time series generated by complex dynamical systems. The time distance between two consecutive crucial events is described by an inverse power law distribution density with a power index $μ$ close to the value $μ= 2$, corresponding to an ideal $1/f$ noise. DEA was used in the recent past to study neurophysiological processes that in the healthy condition are found to generate $1/f$ noise and $μ$ close to $2$. In this paper we find that the seismic fluctuations in both California and Hindu-Kush of extended areas implying the action of many faults, $μ\approx 2.1$, while in regions involving the action of only one fault, or of a very small number of faults, $μ\approx 2.4$. This observation led us the conjectures that the seismic criticality is due to the interaction of many faults. To support this conjecture we adopted a dynamical model for fault dynamics proposed by Brown and Tosatti and we have extended it to describe the interaction between many faults. The DEA applied to surrogate sequences generated by this dynamical model, yields $μ= 2.1$ for a single fault and $μ= 2,4$ for many interacting faults, in a good agreement with the observation of real seismic fluctuations. This result supports our conjecture and suggests interesting applications to neurophysiological and sociological processes.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.